Featured Posts

Amazon love us! They really love us! So, it seems someone at Amazon has finally moved their coffee cup off their "Kindle shipping map" and realised that underneath it lay the little old land of New Zealand. "Oh crap, you guys. We forgot...

Read more

The Booker goes bonkers No, it doesn't really. I was just trying to get your attention. Mean Bookie! So, the 2010 Man Booker Prize longlist of 13 titles has been announced and the ... nominees... are (dundahdahDAH!): Peter...

Read more

Book Review: Cannibal Jack by Trevor Bentley Cannibal Jack : The Life & Times of Jacky Marmon, a Pakeha-Maori by Trevor Bentley, Penguin, RRP$40, ISBN 9780143203827, Available now. Ah, Penguin. It's a rollercoaster ride with you, isn't it?...

Read more

What's BookieMonster reading? Changeless by Gail Carriger Soulless, Changeless, Blameless... Meaningless. Aha! I slay me. :twisted: Changeless and Soulless have bounced around the interwebs for a while so I thought I'd dive in and have a read - Changeless...

Read more

  • Prev
  • Next

What’s BookieMonster reading? Sydney Bridge Upside Down by David Ballantyne

13

Category : Book Reviews, What's BookieMonster Reading?

Sydney Bridge Upside DownI started my review of The Graveyard Book by saying what an embarrassment of riches of reading I’ve had recently and as I’d just finished this book before I wrote that review you’ll probably get a good idea of why I was feeling that way.

Sydney Bridge Upside Down was first published in 1968 and has just been reprinted and reissued by Text Publishing (literally just – last week!). And how very, very, VERY lucky we are. The book is set in a small New Zealand out of the way bay – Calliope Bay (apparently modelled on Hicks Bay, where the author spent some time as a child – more on that below) and is narrated to us by Harry. Harry’s mum has gone to the city for the summer and his cousin Caroline has come to stay with him, his younger brother and his dad.

Caroline is beautiful – and seemingly entrancing for every man and boy in the bay, including Harry who isn’t overly happy about the attention Caroline attracts from everyone (and I mean everyone), and struggles with his own ambivalent and sometimes powerful feelings towards her. Meanwhile it’s summer holidays and so they’re all at play – in their house, in caves, at waterfalls, on the wharf, at the neighbours (there’s like 6 houses of people), in gossip, and shadowing everything there’s “the works” – an abandoned meatworks, crumbling, the scene of several deaths – excluding the more than several animal deaths obviously.

In the brand new introduction Kate de Goldi quotes Patrick Evans as saying that: “Sydney Bridge Upside Down… is the great, and unread, New Zealand novel.” And… oh… is it ever. Gothic, thrilling, creepy, drowsy with summer sunniness – this is that laid back, mad, bad New Zealandness we all know exists but don’t really know how to talk about.

The book starts as a relatively straight-forward seeming narrative but gradually it becomes clear that these are not straight-forward lives – there are questions here, lingering and being ignored, and you just know they can’t be ignored forever. Eventually they will be faced and they will be answered and most likely something terrible, or at least terribly creepy, will happen.

And it does.

The writing is intense, veering between narrative and dreamlike stream of consciousness, but never losing any focus or my attention. I could easily have read this in one sitting, if not distracted by the rest of life.

Sydney Bridge Upside Down drew me in, thrilled me, wrong-footed me and, ultimately, shocked me. It is a wonderful piece of work to have back, and I hope that this time around it is read.

A lot.

Starting with you *points*.

 

P.S. I’ve been to Hicks Bay once about 9 (?) years ago. It’s beautiful in that lazy New Zealand way. You drive in and drive along the beachside road and there’s a few houses and suddenly there are several concrete boxes and you think that’s incredibly strange, it’s like a factory in the middle of nowhere. And of course that’s pretty much what it was for a long time. It’s one of those disparate and ever so odd places that you stumble across in New Zealand.

Oh, and there was a kunekune pig with lots of little hairy piglets running around. I desperately wanted to pick one up and take it home with me. But I didn’t, because I’m responsible. *sigh*

Share:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • Posterous
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg

Comments (13)

Actually, the reason “Sydney Bridge Upside Down” isnt widely read is – because it’s not really good. Nor is anything else David Ballantyne wrote. He has/had a cachet among male homosexuals – cool, OK, good. But as – an ANZ writer- this is a flail-round-in-the-dark-

o, kunekune pets. Dont. They’re really attracticve wee pigs but they’re – pigs.

I hadn’t read any David Ballantyne before this (obviously) and to be honest had barely heard of him other than a vague attention when After the Fireworks came out. I totally enjoyed reading this though – well, no need to restate it.

So cute doesn’t equal pet? Danggit! :D

O, I add that I actually really like pigs?
So much so that I havent eaten them since 1975?

Oh dear, now I feel guilty – I HAVE eaten them since 1975! :)

No worries Ngaire – by the time you’re eating them, they dont mind.

However, beforehand…

I might seem to be harshing on David Ballantyne: I’m not intending that. And -obviously – every reader will make up their own mind.

Suffice it to say, I bought a copy of “Sydney Bridge Upside Down” shortly after it came out. I last read it about 15 years ago and decided, Nah, that’s it, history section of the library.

*sigh* If I ever do have a piggie pet that’s the end of any piggie eating for me.

No, please, opposing views are all good – I like to see more discussion and hey, I’m only giving my opinion – so I really want to see others’ opinions too! And the more different they are the more interesting it is.

I read Gordon McLauchlan’s review in the Saturday NZ Herald this weekend – interestingly enough he highlighted Harry’s mother’s abandonment of the family from the beginning, which I found a little odd to be honest because I thought that was one of the revelatory and catalytic moments that happened later in the book and it was meaningful that the reason for their mother’s absence wasn’t completely clear in the beginning.

On a totally different note it was also fun to review something at the same time as the “establishment”, hehe :)

I appreciated the way the author was able to get things across in Harry’s “voice” – but found the book largely irritating. There were hints of all sorts of things but, being reasonably information hungry, I felt as if my reading senses weren’t fully functioning.

I only just finished it this morning and there are a few things I can’t put my finger on, but I feel slightly discomforted and am frowning because I wanted to really really like it.

Glad you commented! I’d love to see some more comments from recent first-time readers (like me). It’s really interesting to see different reactions, especially to something that’s older. Did you find a disconnect between the more reasonably (seemingly) straightforward chapters and the darker, “dream” chapters?

Kim, I also only finished the book this morning, and feel slightly discomforted, but I think that’s how a reader is supposed to feel. It really is a creepy book. How clever of David Ballantyne to write in the first person, who is the creepiest of all, but have him only slowly reveal the truth of matters. BookieMonster, I didn’t find the reason for Harry’s mother’s leaving the family revelatory and catalytic; by the time I read that towards the end I was ready for anything that wasn’t what it seemed! I loved the book and shall be reading more of David Ballantyne.

Hi Jan, thanks for your comment! I would like to read more David Ballantyne too – with the caveat that I am slightly afraid nothing will live up to my reaction to Sydney Bridge Upside Down.

Just finished this also and enjoyed it very much – I think I’ll need to reread again though, to bring out more of the details and things I think I missed (e.g., when did Dibs Kelly actually fall over that cliff? And what happened?).

My first encounter with proper New Zealand gothic was, of course, The Scarecrow back on a third-year university course – haven’t read that one recently but the comparison might be interesting…

I’m rereading SBUD also, waiting until the library notifies me that the next David Ballantyne book I have requested has arrived. I had forgotten in the first few pages that Dibs Kelly fell from the cliff – or did he? One of Harry’s fibs? Also, how old would Harry be? I think about 13/14, and thought initially Caroline was 16, but she must be closer to 18 given that she gets engaged at the end. She is a tarty tease, and her fibbing (about the Uncle Pember chapters in her book) gives Harry a good run for his money. I wonder if Harry is a warning to all those parents who think their children can do no wrong, and the children who blame everyone else for their misfortunes in life!

Hmm. Regarding that cliff, at one point mid-book I remember Harry talking with Caroline about playing up there cliff; Dibs interrupts asking Harry to tell Caroline what he did to him up there one day – Harry cuts him off threateningly saying “We have good fun up there – so far no accidents”…

Maybe something quite different happened up there which Harry is not going to be open about…

(Of course later on it’s apparent, in a different sense, that there are very few accidents indeed…)

Post a comment

© 2009-2010 BookieMonster All Rights Reserved -- Copyright notice by Blog Copyright

Better Tag Cloud