Text Publishing, RRP$39, Release date 3 May 2010
I love Philip Pullman. I love him like I’m a 12 year old girl and he’s a purple unicorn that’s just turned up on my doorstep and blown heart shaped bubbles in my face. That much, right? I mean everyone liked the His Dark Materials series (well, almost everyone) but I even like the Sally Lockhart Mysteries and sadly, not as many people like those.
I approached The Good Man Jesus and the Scoundrel Christ with some amount of trepidation, however. This is a book that tells the Jesus story and my relationship with religion and religious stories is one that alternates between being fraught and of “meh”. Fortunately though, despite the provocative title, Pullman is not coming from a perspective of “Christians done us wrong”. This is the story of stories. The story of history and the nature of truth and the way those two ideas change depending on who is doing the telling.
In Pullman’s story there are two “Jesuses” (yes, I really, really want to write “Jesi”) – two brothers, Jesus and Christ. Jesus is the beloved brother, the “good man” who doesn’t think he is a Messiah but everyone else does, and Christ is the “scoundrel”, the favourite of Mary, who thinks of himself as a secret Messiah when no-one else does. Thus begins the story that continues along a familiar route with the occasional feeling of boxes being ticked off (Magdalene, tick. Loaves and fishes, tick.)
In some ways The Good Man Jesus and the Scoundrel Christ is very much like the Bible Jesus story – there are periods of blah interspersed with breakthrough moments that shine. Truly shine.
Pullman has done his most spectacular work with the chapter Jesus in the Garden at Gethsamane. This is the chapter that reminded me why I love Pullman so much. Jesus is attempting a dialogue with God but he gets a monologue instead. God is quiet. God is silent. God makes no move. And in the words you can hear Jesus’ heart breaking and his faith in a god dying slowly.
The psalm says “The fool has said in his heart, There is no God.” Well, I understand that fool. You treated him as you’re treating me, didn’t you? If that makes me a fool, I’m one with all the fools you made. I love that fool, even if you don’t. The poor sod whispered to you night after night, and heard nothing in response.
I suppose it will be passages such as this and Pullman’s treatment of the story of Jesus’ resurrection that will gain him the most “notoriety” amongst those who hold these things sacred and beyond change.
What I liked best here are the two ideas that I feel Pullman is exploring:
1. Character, and particularly characters in stories. In TGMJATSC Jesus is the man who talks to everyone but no-one seems to hear what he’s saying. His message becomes much bigger than his intention and you get the impression from the secondhand stories we’re hearing that he gets rather downright pissy about this. Jesus is telling a simple story about how people should live their lives. He is a man who knows he is not being heard by the people, and most of all he knows he is not being heard by his God.
Christ, on the other hand, is the man who talks to hardly anyone but one person, who he has convinced himself is an angel. And Christ thinks his words are much bigger than they really are, he thinks he’s telling the story to end all stories, the story of the coming of heaven on earth and the story to feed an entire church, and the story of his God.
2. Stories. How the story changes to fit the truth. How the truth gets changed to fit the story. How powerful stories are that millions of people are prepared to live their lives by them. How all of us are prepared to live our lives by stories. Aren’t we?
There is so much to admire and enjoy in The Good Man Jesus and the Scoundrel Christ but in the end I have to be honest and say I feel about it very much like I feel about the Bible Jesus story. I don’t really know. It feels cold and distant. It doesn’t induce in me any revelations, it doesn’t lead me to think differently, or be differently, or do differently. It’s interesting but it hasn’t changed my life.
But I know it has changed the lives of millions, and so, like Jesus, I can only think:
I’ve been speaking to you all my life and all I’ve heard back is silence. Where are you? Are you out there among the stars? Is that it? Busy making another world, perhaps, because you’re sick of this one?
What in the world…? Who the heck doesn’t like the Sally Lockhart books!
Thanks for the review. I am not very familiar with the Bible at all and was wondering if this book will even be ‘accessible’ to me in terms of whether I’ll get any of the references or not. Probably not. Might leave this one for a later day.
I know!
I’m only familiar with the Bible in a cursory way but then having grown up in a English-descended white Western family am probably more familiar with it than I realise, because of things like Easter, Christmas, etc.
Having said that though, this was by no means an inaccessible book. Even as a stand-alone story, if you had no knowledge of the Bible at all, I think it would still be an interesting read, though the tone might seem slightly strange at times (he echoes the Bible quite a lot). The story isn’t completely anchored to the Bible, it’s more free-floating than that and the ideas he’s exploring are pretty universal all round. We all have our stories.
I have the same relationship towards Phillip Pullman as you do, Ngaire – total adoringness. I also loved the Sally Lockhart series, and we’ve also loved his younger children’s stories like The Soldier and the Scarecrow (?), Count Karlstein, his retelling of Puss in Boots and many, many more. He’s a riot, a one-man party. And of course he gladdens my atheist heart.
What do you think he’s on about with this book? I’ll have to say the idea of it doesn’t grab me too much.
That’s a good question. I think he’s purposefully chosen what is really the quintessential Western Christian based story in order to explore the ideas of how stories become histories.
But at the same time it has a slightly strange flavour to it (at least for me) because it sounds like the Bible at a lot of times which I found a little hard to get past.
I think there was a lot of fear when the book was announced that he was somehow going to use it to “stick it” to Christianity, but I think he’s actually much more interested in how people’s personal religion transmutes into organised religion.
Maybe?
Oh thanks for replying Ngaire. I’ll def’ly not let my fears about its inaccessibility deter me from checking it out
I found the Sally Lockhart series waay before ‘His Dark Materials’ came out, and deeply relish both of them. I dont think I’ll bother with TGMJ&TSC though: I have read the bible (*all*of it and struth, is there a lot of deeply boring junk writing in there!) several times (only in English versions – I’ve read the NT i te reo.) I studied religion for nearly 32 years – and became an atheist thereby. And cant be bothered with reading a religously-based story, even when it’s about story-making. Even when it’s by Pullman.
I think you have convinced me, K. Hulme. Reckon I’d rather re-read the adventures of Sally and Lyra and co. once more.
BTW everyone, Kim Hill is interviewing Pullman on her show tomorrow morning at 11:45 am, about this very book.
Thanks for that Carol, I will have to listen in (or download the podcast), cheers!
I have to admit I felt very similarly to you. I wasn’t moved by the book in any real or profound way. I appreciated the idea, and the evident effort that Pullman had put in, but the execution was just a little off for me.
My review: The Good Man Jesus and the Scoundrel Christ by Philip Pullman
Pingback: Book Review: Ragnarok by A.S. Byatt | BookieMonster